EPSO verbal reasoning test: format, pass score and practice

The EPSO verbal reasoning test measures your ability to reason logically about a short text: 20 multiple-choice questions in 35 minutes.

Applications closed

Application deadline
Last verified

Notice EPSO/AD/427/26

Official test parameters

Each question presents a paragraph and four statements: only one can be deduced from the text, while the other three are true elsewhere, overstated, or absent from the paragraph.

Questions
20
Duration
35min
Pass score
10/20
Weight
35%
Scoring
1 pt/question
Eliminatory
Yes
Ranked
Yes
Notice
EPSO/AD/427/26

The test is eliminatory: below 10/20, the application goes no further. Its score then counts for 35% of the ranking mark.

Administrateurs généralistes (AD 5)EPSO/AD/427/26
Verbal reasoning
Questions20
Duration35 min
Language-
Scoring1 pt/question
Pass score10/20
EliminatoryYes
RankedYes
Weight35 %
Numerical reasoning
Questions10
Duration20 min
Language-
Scoring1 pt/question
Pass score10/20 (combined)
EliminatoryYes
RankedNo
Weight-
Abstract reasoning
Questions10
Duration10 min
Language-
Scoring1 pt/question
Pass score10/20 (combined)
EliminatoryYes
RankedNo
Weight-
EU knowledge
Questions30
Duration40 min
LanguageL2
Scoring1 pt/question
Pass score15/30
EliminatoryYes
RankedYes
Weight25 %
Digital skills
Questions40
Duration30 min
LanguageL2
Scoring1 pt/question
Pass score20/40
EliminatoryYes
RankedYes
Weight25 %
EUFTE (written test)
Questions1
Duration40 min
LanguageL2
Scoring1 pt/question
Pass score-
EliminatoryYes
RankedYes
Weight15 %

Content based on the notice EPSO/AD/427/26 (C/2026/711). Official parameters last verified: .

The competitions that include this test

Verbal reasoning is the most widely used test in the EPSO system: it opens almost every competition, from generalist administrators to assistants, specialists and lawyer-linguists.

The parameters change from one competition to the next, and that is the trap: the number of questions, the duration and above all the way the pass score is calculated are not the same everywhere. The table below sets out, competition by competition, what the Official Journal publishes.

Worth remembering: in some competitions verbal reasoning has its own pass score, in others it is merged into a combined pass score with numerical and abstract reasoning. A weak verbal mark cannot be made up in the same way in both cases.

Official test parameters
Administrateurs généralistes (AD 5)EPSO/AD/427/26
Questions20
Duration35 min
Language-
Pass score10/20
Weight35 %
Assistants communication (AST 3)EPSO/AST/157/25
Questions20
Duration35 min
Language-
Pass score10/20
Weight-
Administrateurs audit (AD 7)EPSO/AD/428/26
Questions20
Duration35 min
Language-
Pass score10/20
Weight-
CAST Permanent (agents contractuels FG I à FG IV)CAST Permanent
Questions20
Duration35 min
Language-
Pass score10/20
Weight-
Administrateurs fiscalité (AD 6)EPSO/AD/422/25
Questions20
Duration35 min
Language-
Pass score10/20
Weight-
Administrateurs gestion et connaissance des données (AD 7)EPSO/AD/426/25
Questions20
Duration35 min
Language-
Pass score10/20
Weight-
Juristes-linguistes CJUE (AD 7)EPSO/AD/424/25
Questions20
Duration35 min
Language-
Pass score20/40 (combined)
Weight-
Juristes-linguistes et réviseurs juridiques PE, Conseil, Commission (AD 7)EPSO/AD/423/25
Questions10
Duration18 min
Language-
Pass score15/30 (combined)
Weight-
Administrateurs TIC (AD 7)EPSO/AD/429/26
Questions20
Duration35 min
Language-
Pass score10/20
Weight-
Traducteurs (AD 5)EPSO/AD/414/24 a EPSO/AD/421/24
Questions10
Duration18 min
Language-
Pass score22/40 (combined)
Weight-

The competition families

What it actually measures, and what it does not

What the test measures

  • Strict deduction: what the paragraph allows you to conclude, and nothing more.
  • Resistance to over-generalisation: spotting that an “all”, an “always” or a “never” goes further than the text.
  • Reading under time pressure: with 20 questions in 35 minutes, you have to decide quickly without reading three times.
  • Attention to quantifiers, dates and logical links (“although”, “unless”), which tip a statement from true to false.

What it does not measure

  • Your knowledge: the paragraph contains everything you need, and a statement that is true in the real world but absent from the text is wrong here.
  • Your knowledge of Europe: that is assessed in another test, the EU knowledge test.
  • Your writing style: nothing has to be drafted, only the option you select counts.
  • Your raw reading speed: reading fast without identifying the question does not earn points.

The format in detail: the five ways to get caught out

The notice of competition publishes no sub-domains for verbal reasoning: it sets the number of questions, the duration and the pass score, not a taxonomy. What follows is therefore not an official list, but the typology we draw from our own question bank, describing the five mechanisms candidates actually meet.

  1. Direct deduction

    The correct statement follows from the text in a single step. This is the simplest case, and the rarest: the difficulty comes from the other three options.

  2. Over-generalisation

    The text says “in several member states”, the option says “in all of them”. The statement is stronger than the paragraph: it is wrong, even though it is close to it.

  3. The statement that is true outside the text

    The option states an accurate fact about the European Union, but one the paragraph does not mention. It traps candidates who know the subject, not those who read the text.

  4. The reversed logical link

    Cause and effect swapped, a condition turned into a general rule, an exception overlooked. The connectors “although”, “unless” and “provided that” are the hinges to watch.

  5. The displaced figure

    A date, a percentage or a quantity from the paragraph is reused in the option, but attached to the wrong object. The figure is right, the statement is not.

Typology established by Erudiam from its question bank. The official notice of competition publishes no sub-domains for this test: the only official figures on this page are those in the table and the banner, taken from the Official Journal.

Try questions from the test

The questions below come from our practice bank, in the format of the test: one paragraph, four statements, only one deducible from the text, with the full worked answer and an analysis of every distractor.

Question 1 / 6

The demographic ageing of developed countries results from the combination of two dynamics: the continuous increase in life expectancy and the persistent fall in fertility below replacement level. In the European Union, the share of those aged 65 and over rose from around 14% of the population in 1990 to 21% in 2022, while the share of those under 15 declined over the same period. This twin movement profoundly alters the need for public services: health, long-term care, pensions, adapted housing. The social-protection models inherited from Esping-Andersen's typology (1990) (liberal, conservative-corporatist and social-democratic) respond to these challenges in contrasting ways: the first favours means-tested benefits, the second employment-linked insurance, the third universal services funded by taxation. None of these models is fully shielded from the budgetary tensions linked to ageing, but they do not respond to them with the same intergenerational fairness.

Which of the following statements is correct?

Answer key : B

Text: "In the European Union, the share of those aged 65 and over rose from around 14% of the population in 1990 to 21% in 2022, while the share of those under 15 declined over the same period".

A. Contradicts the passage: the models do not respond to ageing-related tensions "with the same intergenerational fairness".

B. Text: "In the European Union, the share of those aged 65 and over rose from around 14% of the population in 1990 to 21% in 2022, while the share of those under 15 declined over the same period".

C. Contradicts the passage: ageing results from "the combination of two dynamics: the continuous increase in life expectancy and the persistent fall in fertility", not fertility alone.

D. Contradicts the passage: the third model named is "social-democratic", not a "universalist-Anglo-Saxon" model.

Questions written by Erudiam from official EU sources; EPSO does not publish past papers.

Common mistakes and method

  1. The most common mistake is answering from what you know. A statement that is accurate about the European Union but absent from the paragraph is marked wrong: the only question asked is whether the text says so.

  2. The second is reading the paragraph before the question. If you read the question first, you know what to look for, and targeted rereading takes a few seconds instead of a minute. With 20 questions in 35 minutes, those seconds make the difference to your mark.

  3. The third is refusing to let go. A question you get stuck on costs you two easy ones; flagging it and moving on is better than gaining one point and losing two.

The method that works

first identify the quantifiers and connectors in each option, eliminate anything that goes beyond the text, then check the remaining option word by word against the paragraph.

How Erudiam trains this test

  • Every question is worked through option by option: you see why the correct answer can be deduced, and above all by which mechanism each of the three distractors fails.
  • Spaced repetition (the FSRS algorithm) reschedules the mechanisms you get wrong, rather than having you run through full tests in which you mostly go over what you already know.
  • The readiness index (ERI) aggregates coverage, regularity and success rate to show whether you are ready, on this test as on the others in the competition.
  • Real-conditions tests reproduce the time pressure of the real thing: that is where the difference shows between knowing the answer and knowing it within a minute.
Erudiam dashboard on desktop: streak, level and daily mission.Erudiam dashboard on desktop: streak, level and daily mission.
Erudiam dashboard on mobile: streak and daily mission.Erudiam dashboard on mobile: streak and daily mission.

Frequently asked questions about the verbal reasoning test

Content based on the notice EPSO/AD/427/26 (C/2026/711). Official parameters last verified: . Page last modified: .

  • Written and verified by Jean de Loynes

20 multiple-choice questions in 35 minutes in the competition for generalist administrators, according to the official notice (reference at the foot of the page). The parameters differ between competitions: the table on this page compares them.