EPSO verbal reasoning test: format, pass score and practice
The EPSO verbal reasoning test measures your ability to reason logically about a short text: 20 multiple-choice questions in 35 minutes.
Applications closed
- Application deadline
- Last verified
Notice EPSO/AD/427/26
Official test parameters
Each question presents a paragraph and four statements: only one can be deduced from the text, while the other three are true elsewhere, overstated, or absent from the paragraph.
- Questions
- 20
- Duration
- 35min
- Pass score
- 10/20
- Weight
- 35%
- Scoring
- 1 pt/question
- Eliminatory
- Yes
- Ranked
- Yes
- Notice
- EPSO/AD/427/26
The test is eliminatory: below 10/20, the application goes no further. Its score then counts for 35% of the ranking mark.
Verbal reasoning
Numerical reasoning
Abstract reasoning
EU knowledge
Digital skills
EUFTE (written test)
Content based on the notice EPSO/AD/427/26 (C/2026/711). Official parameters last verified: .
The competitions that include this test
Verbal reasoning is the most widely used test in the EPSO system: it opens almost every competition, from generalist administrators to assistants, specialists and lawyer-linguists.
The parameters change from one competition to the next, and that is the trap: the number of questions, the duration and above all the way the pass score is calculated are not the same everywhere. The table below sets out, competition by competition, what the Official Journal publishes.
Worth remembering: in some competitions verbal reasoning has its own pass score, in others it is merged into a combined pass score with numerical and abstract reasoning. A weak verbal mark cannot be made up in the same way in both cases.
Administrateurs généralistes (AD 5)EPSO/AD/427/26
Assistants communication (AST 3)EPSO/AST/157/25
Administrateurs audit (AD 7)EPSO/AD/428/26
CAST Permanent (agents contractuels FG I à FG IV)CAST Permanent
Administrateurs fiscalité (AD 6)EPSO/AD/422/25
Administrateurs gestion et connaissance des données (AD 7)EPSO/AD/426/25
Juristes-linguistes CJUE (AD 7)EPSO/AD/424/25
Juristes-linguistes et réviseurs juridiques PE, Conseil, Commission (AD 7)EPSO/AD/423/25
Administrateurs TIC (AD 7)EPSO/AD/429/26
Traducteurs (AD 5)EPSO/AD/414/24 a EPSO/AD/421/24
The competition families
- AD 5
Generalist administrators
- AST 3
Communication assistants (AST 3)
- AD 7
Administrators in the field of audit (AD 7)
- CAST
Contract agents (permanent)
- AD 6
Administrators in taxation (AD 6)
- AD 7
Administrators in data and knowledge management (AD 7)
- AD 7
CJEU lawyer-linguists (AD 7)
- AD 7
Lawyer-linguists and legal revisers for the EP, Council and Commission (AD 7)
- AD 7
ICT administrators (AD 7)
- AD 5
Translators (AD 5)
What it actually measures, and what it does not
What the test measures
- Strict deduction: what the paragraph allows you to conclude, and nothing more.
- Resistance to over-generalisation: spotting that an “all”, an “always” or a “never” goes further than the text.
- Reading under time pressure: with 20 questions in 35 minutes, you have to decide quickly without reading three times.
- Attention to quantifiers, dates and logical links (“although”, “unless”), which tip a statement from true to false.
What it does not measure
- Your knowledge: the paragraph contains everything you need, and a statement that is true in the real world but absent from the text is wrong here.
- Your knowledge of Europe: that is assessed in another test, the EU knowledge test.
- Your writing style: nothing has to be drafted, only the option you select counts.
- Your raw reading speed: reading fast without identifying the question does not earn points.
The format in detail: the five ways to get caught out
The notice of competition publishes no sub-domains for verbal reasoning: it sets the number of questions, the duration and the pass score, not a taxonomy. What follows is therefore not an official list, but the typology we draw from our own question bank, describing the five mechanisms candidates actually meet.
Direct deduction
The correct statement follows from the text in a single step. This is the simplest case, and the rarest: the difficulty comes from the other three options.
Over-generalisation
The text says “in several member states”, the option says “in all of them”. The statement is stronger than the paragraph: it is wrong, even though it is close to it.
The statement that is true outside the text
The option states an accurate fact about the European Union, but one the paragraph does not mention. It traps candidates who know the subject, not those who read the text.
The reversed logical link
Cause and effect swapped, a condition turned into a general rule, an exception overlooked. The connectors “although”, “unless” and “provided that” are the hinges to watch.
The displaced figure
A date, a percentage or a quantity from the paragraph is reused in the option, but attached to the wrong object. The figure is right, the statement is not.
Typology established by Erudiam from its question bank. The official notice of competition publishes no sub-domains for this test: the only official figures on this page are those in the table and the banner, taken from the Official Journal.
Try questions from the test
The questions below come from our practice bank, in the format of the test: one paragraph, four statements, only one deducible from the text, with the full worked answer and an analysis of every distractor.
Answer key : B
Text: "In the European Union, the share of those aged 65 and over rose from around 14% of the population in 1990 to 21% in 2022, while the share of those under 15 declined over the same period".
A. Contradicts the passage: the models do not respond to ageing-related tensions "with the same intergenerational fairness".
B. Text: "In the European Union, the share of those aged 65 and over rose from around 14% of the population in 1990 to 21% in 2022, while the share of those under 15 declined over the same period".
C. Contradicts the passage: ageing results from "the combination of two dynamics: the continuous increase in life expectancy and the persistent fall in fertility", not fertility alone.
D. Contradicts the passage: the third model named is "social-democratic", not a "universalist-Anglo-Saxon" model.
Answer key : D
Statement D is supported by the third sentence. Statement A contradicts the first sentence: in force since 2021. Statement B contradicts the second sentence. Statement C contradicts the third sentence.
A. Wrong date: the Regulation has been in force since 1 January 2021, not 2018.
B. Wrong: the Court of Justice confirmed the Regulation's legality in February 2022; it did not annul it.
C. Wrong: the Regulation can and did lead to suspension of funds, as shown by the December 2022 measures against Hungary.
D. Third sentence supports this.
Answer key : A
Text: "Launched by NASA on 5 September 1977" and "In 2013, NASA confirmed that Voyager 1 had crossed the heliopause in 2012".
A. Text: "Launched by NASA on 5 September 1977" and "In 2013, NASA confirmed that Voyager 1 had crossed the heliopause in 2012".
B. The paragraph states Voyager 1 flew past Jupiter in 1979, not Mars.
C. The paragraph states the probe is powered by a plutonium radioisotope thermoelectric generator, not solar panels.
D. The paragraph states the probe is still transmitting scientific data in 2025.
Answer key : C
The text notes: "this forced exile ensured the global influence of Bauhaus principles". Statement C paraphrases faithfully.
A. A contradicts the text: the Bauhaus motto expressed "a rejection of gratuitous ornament", not a taste for ornamented design.
B. B contradicts the text: the school was "closed in 1933 under pressure from the Nazi regime", not kept running throughout the century.
C. The text notes: "this forced exile ensured the global influence of Bauhaus principles". Statement C paraphrases faithfully.
D. D contradicts the text: the Bauhaus was founded in Weimar in 1919 by Walter Gropius, not in Berlin in 1925 by Mies van der Rohe.
Answer key : D
Text: "the Ingenuity helicopter, the first vehicle to perform a controlled powered flight on another planet, in April 2021".
A. The paragraph states Curiosity confirmed an aqueous environment compatible with microbial life, "but it did not detect any traces of such life".
B. The paragraph states no Martian samples have yet been returned to Earth.
C. The paragraph states China became the second country, not the first, to land a rover on Mars.
D. Text: "the Ingenuity helicopter, the first vehicle to perform a controlled powered flight on another planet, in April 2021".
Answer key : A
Statement A is supported by the third sentence. Statement B contradicts the second sentence: any nationality. Statement C contradicts the fourth sentence: more than 13,000. Statement D contradicts the fifth sentence: around EUR 16 billion.
A. Third sentence supports this.
B. The paragraph states the ERC funds researchers of any nationality, not only EU nationals.
C. The paragraph states more than 13,000 projects have been supported as of 2024, not around 1,300.
D. The paragraph gives the ERC budget under Horizon Europe as around EUR 16 billion, not 5 billion.
Questions written by Erudiam from official EU sources; EPSO does not publish past papers.
Common mistakes and method
The most common mistake is answering from what you know. A statement that is accurate about the European Union but absent from the paragraph is marked wrong: the only question asked is whether the text says so.
The second is reading the paragraph before the question. If you read the question first, you know what to look for, and targeted rereading takes a few seconds instead of a minute. With 20 questions in 35 minutes, those seconds make the difference to your mark.
The third is refusing to let go. A question you get stuck on costs you two easy ones; flagging it and moving on is better than gaining one point and losing two.
The method that works
first identify the quantifiers and connectors in each option, eliminate anything that goes beyond the text, then check the remaining option word by word against the paragraph.
How Erudiam trains this test
- Every question is worked through option by option: you see why the correct answer can be deduced, and above all by which mechanism each of the three distractors fails.
- Spaced repetition (the FSRS algorithm) reschedules the mechanisms you get wrong, rather than having you run through full tests in which you mostly go over what you already know.
- The readiness index (ERI) aggregates coverage, regularity and success rate to show whether you are ready, on this test as on the others in the competition.
- Real-conditions tests reproduce the time pressure of the real thing: that is where the difference shows between knowing the answer and knowing it within a minute.




Frequently asked questions about the verbal reasoning test
20 multiple-choice questions in 35 minutes in the competition for generalist administrators, according to the official notice (reference at the foot of the page). The parameters differ between competitions: the table on this page compares them.
10 points out of 20 for this competition. The test is eliminatory and its score counts for 35% of the final mark used for the ranking.
We do not state that here. The official parameters we recorded set a language regime for EU knowledge, digital skills and the written test, but not for verbal reasoning. Your individual invitation and the notice of the competition concerned remain the only reference.
In almost every one. It is the most widely used test in the system: it appears in competitions for everyone from generalist administrators to assistants, specialists and lawyer-linguists. The table on this page lists those we track, with their exact parameters.
No, and assuming otherwise is a classic trap. The paragraph contains everything you need; a statement that is true in reality but absent from the text is marked wrong.
By working on the distractor mechanisms rather than running through full tests: first identify which ones catch you out, practise them separately, then take a test under real conditions again to check that your progress holds under time pressure.